The Influence of Peer Assessment and the Use of Corpus for the Development of Speaking Skills in In-Service Teachers

Main Article Content

Mary Mily Gómez Sará

Abstract

This article reports on how the use of peer-assessment and a corpus influence the development of the spontaneous interactive speaking of 14 adults with an A1 English level. The data, that were collected through video recordings, two peer-assessment forms, and a teacher’s journal, evidenced the development of three enhancement strategies (willingness to improve, use of compensatory strategies, and construction of a personalized version of the corpus) and two detrimental traits (underassessment and dependency on the corpus).The results of the inquiry evinced some limitations in the pedagogical intervention.

Article Details

How to Cite
Gómez Sará, M. M. (2016). The Influence of Peer Assessment and the Use of Corpus for the Development of Speaking Skills in In-Service Teachers. HOW, 23(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.23.1.142
Section
Reports on Pedagogical Experiences
Author Biography

Mary Mily Gómez Sará, Universidad de La Sabana

Mary Mily Gómez Sará holds a Master in English language teaching with an emphasis on autonomous learning environments from Universidad de La Sabana (Colombia).

References

Ahangari, S., Rassekh-Alqol, B., & Akbari, L. A. (2013). The effect of peer assessment on oral presentation in an EFL context. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 2(3), 45-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.2n.3p.45.

Bennett, G. R. (2010). Using corpora in the language learning classroom: Corpus linguistics for participants. Michigan ELT, 1-22. Retrieved from http://www.international.ucla.edu/media/files/Using-corpora-in-the-language-learning-classroom--Corpus-linguistics-for-teachers-my-atc.pdf?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1.

Chu, H., & Wang, R. (2011). Oral and written competence of Chinese foreign language learners in terms of lexical chunks. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(1), 223-226. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n1p223.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Council of Europe. (2014). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Retrieved from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/linguistic/source/framework_en.pdf.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363-406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363.

Glasson, T. (2009). Improving student achievement: A practical guide to assessment for learning. Carlton, AU: Curriculum Corporation.

Gómez, D. (2014). The impact of peer and self-assessment on teenage B2 students’use of present perfect simple, present perfect continuous and past perfect simple in their spontaneous spoken productions (Master’s thesis). Universidad de La Sabana, Bogotá, Colombia.

Koshy, V. (2005). Action research for improving practice: A practical guide. London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing.

Lim, P. T. H. (2007, May). Action research for teachers: A balanced model. Proceeding of the Redesigning Pedagogy: Culture, Knowledge and Understanding Conference 2007, Singapore. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.570.1170&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2009). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (7th ed.). London, UK: Pearson Education.

Moudraia, O. (2001). Lexical approach to second language teaching. ERIC Digest. Retrieved from http://www.cal.org/index.php/content/download/1546/16373/file/LexicalApproachtoSecondLanguageTeaching.pdf.

Sagor, R. (2000). Guiding school improvement with action research. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Serrano, J., & Cebrián de la Serna, M. (2011). Study of the impact on student learning using the eRubric tool and peer assessment. In A. Méndez-Vilas (Ed.), Education in a technological world: Communicating current and emerging research and technological efforts (pp. 421-427). Badajoz, ES: Formatex Research Center.

Suzuki, T. (2008, August). A corpus-based study of the speech act of “comforting”: Naturalness and appropriateness for English language teaching. Paper presented at the 13th PAAL Conference, University of Hawaii, Manoa, USA. Retrieved from http://www.f.waseda.jp/toshisuz/paal2008handout.pdf.

Suzuki, T. (2009a). A study of lexicogrammatical and discourse strategies for ‘suggestion’ with the use of the English speech act corpus. Retrieved from http://dspace.wul.waseda.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/2065/29661/1/BunkaRonshu_34_Suzuki.pdf.

Suzuki, T. (2009b). How do American university students “invite” others? A corpus- based study of linguistic strategies for the speech act of “invitations”. The Cultural Review, 4(35), 85-106. Retrieved from http://www.waseda.jp/w-com/quotient/publications/pdf/bun35_04.pdf.

Suzuki, T. (2010). A corpus-linguistic approach to the verbal realization of “comforting”. The Cultural Review, 4(36), 81-103. Retrieved from http://www.waseda.jp/w-com/quotient/publications/pdf/bun36_04.pdf.

Suzuki, T. (2011). Children’s pragmatic competence: A case study of English speech acts performed by American children. The Cultural Review, 3(38), 55-73. Retrieved from http://www.waseda.jp/w-com/quotient/publications/pdf/bun38_03.pdf.

Thornbury, S. (2008). How to teach speaking. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

Valcarcel, D. (2009). Action research essentials. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Willis, D., & Willis, J. (2012). Doing task-based teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.