Principles of Self-Regulation in EFL mediated by Dialogic Tutoring Sessions

Main Article Content

Imelda Zorro Rojas


Students’ engagement and determination require the use of self-regulated learning strategies to facilitate adequate preparation. This article reports a research study that looks into how eight instructors, who were trained to promote self-regulation, interact with 18 students of a Bachelor of Arts program in English language teaching in Bogotá. The problem was the prevalence of an instructional model of reproduction of knowledge in the English language classes taken by the 18 students. The pedagogical intervention introduces dialogic tutoring. The instructors’ voices, in the role of tutors, and the students’ voices, as tutees, were collected in 40 videos, a questionnaire, and a focus group. Grounded theory allowed transposing the identification of patterns, code tagging, and code grouping into concepts. This process generated four principles that worked positively in the promotion of self-regulation in this socially and culturally diverse sample of instructors and students, namely: (1) addressing needs, interests and beliefs; (2) setting goals; (3) scaffolding learning; (4) providing quality feedback.

Article Details

How to Cite
Zorro Rojas, I. (2019). Principles of Self-Regulation in EFL mediated by Dialogic Tutoring Sessions. HOW Journal, 26(2), 33-57.
Research Reports
Author Biography

Imelda Zorro Rojas, Universidad Libre

Imelda Zorro Rojas teaches at the graduate and undergraduate TEFL preparation program at Universidad Libre de Colombia. Her research interests include pedagogy and autonomous learning. She holds a doctorate in education from Universidad Santo Tomás, Colombia. She has published books and articles in the field of applied linguistics. She leads the research group Didaktikos.


Banegas, D. L. (Ed.) (2017). Initial English language teacher education: International perspectives on research, curriculum and practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Bakhtin, M. M., & Holquist, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: The
University of Texas. 268-422.
Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. Harlow: Longman Pearson Education.
Benson, P. (2011). What is new in autonomy? The Language Teacher, 35(4), 15–18.
Boerkaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.) (2005). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Castillo, R. (2014). Teaching and learning another language strategically. Bogotá: Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Inc.
Gardner, D., & Miller, L. (1996). Tasks for independent language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gu, Y. (2010). The strategic self-regulation (S2R) Model of Language learning. London: Pearson.
Harris, L., Brown, G. T. L., & Dargusch, J. (2018). Not playing the game: Student assessment resistance as a form of agency. The Australian Educational Researcher, 45 (1), 125-140.
Holec, H. (1981). Autonomy in foreign language learning. Oxford: Pergamon.
Kanda University (2007). Module packs available. Accessed 1 April 2018 from:
Kluwe, R. H. (1987). Executive decisions and regulation of problem solving behavior. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.) Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 31-63). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lantolf, J. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P., & Pavlenko, A. (2001). Second language activity: understanding learners as people. In M. Breen (Ed.), Learner contributions to language learning: New directions in research (pp. 141-158). London: Pearson.
Gathercole, I. (Ed.) (1991). Autonomy in language learning. London: CILT.
Luidig, C., & Mynard, J. (Eds.) (2012). Autonomy in Language Learning: Advising in Action IATEFL. New York: Darwin College.
Magno, C. (2009). Self-regulation and approaches to learning in composition writing in English. TESOL Journal, (1), 1-16.
McGarry, D. (1995). Learner autonomy: The role of authentic texts. Dublin: Authentik.
Mynard, J., & Carson, L. (2013). Advising in language learning, dialogue, tools and context. London & New York: Pearson.
Nakata, Y. (2014). Self-regulation: Why is it important for promoting learning autonomy in the school context? Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 5(4), 342-356.
Nunan, D. (1997). Does learner strategy training make a difference? Modern languages, 24, 123-142.
Oekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeider, M. (2005). Handbook of self-regulation. London: Academic Press.
Sarangi, S. (2000). Activity types, discourse types and interactional hybridity: The case of genetic counseling. In S. Sarangi & M. Coulthard (Eds.). Discourse and Social Life (pp. 1-27). London: Pearson.
Sabitha, S. R. N. (2013). Learner autonomy in language learning. Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 70, 1238–1242.
Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Straus, A., & Corbin, J. (2002). Bases de la investigación cualitativa. Técnicas y procedimientos para desarrollar la Teoría Fundamentada. Medellín: Universidad de Antioquia.
Thanasoulas, D. (2000). What is learner autonomy and how can it be fostered? The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. VI, 11, 1-12.
University of Cambridge (2017). What is Dialogic Teaching? Cambridge: The faculty of Education. Retrieved January 28, 2018 from:
Voloshinov, V. (1976). El signo ideológico y la filosofía del lenguaje. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Yamaguchi, A. (2012). Creative tools that facilitate the advising process. In C. Ludwig & J. Mynard (Eds.), Autonomy in language learning. Advising in action. Canterbury: IATEFL.
Wells, G. (2001). Indagación dialógica. Hacia una teoría y una práctica sociocultural de la educación. Barcelona: Paidós.