Tracking the Path of Communities of Inquiry in TEFL: A Literature Review

Main Article Content

Darlene González Miy
Luz Edith Herrera Diaz

Abstract

The community of inquiry is a techno-pedagogical framework that has gathered significant attention in online education research. It has been implemented in diverse disciplines, (foreign) language learning being one of particular interest for the authors of this paper. Due to the dynamics proposed by the framework, it appears as a practical and relevant option to generate a successful learning experience for English as a Second or Foreign Language learners. Therefore, this article provides a brief description of the model, its theoretical foundation, its applications and potential uses in the area of language learning in online environments.

Article Details

How to Cite
González Miy, D., & Herrera Diaz, L. E. (2015). Tracking the Path of Communities of Inquiry in TEFL: A Literature Review. HOW, 22(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.22.1.83
Section
Reflections and Revision of Themes
Author Biographies

Darlene González Miy, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz

Darlene González Miy is an English e-tutor and teacher. She holds an MA in TEFL from Universidad de Jaén (Spain). She is a doctoral student (Educational Systems and Environments) at Universidad Veracruzana (Mexico).

Luz Edith Herrera Diaz, Universidad Veracruzana, Veracruz

Luz Edith Herrera Díaz is a professor-researcher at the Language Center in Universidad Veracruzana (Mexico). She is currently a teacher and the coordinator of the MA TEFL program in Veracruz. She holds a PhD in language studies (Kent University, UK).

References

Akyol, Z. (2013). Metacognitive development within the community of inquiry. In D. R. Garrison & Z. Akyol (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 30-44). Hershey, PA: Information Science http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch003.

Akyol, Z., Garrison, D. R., & Ozden, M. Y. (2009). Online and blended communities of inquiry: Exploring the developmental and perceptional differences. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(6), 65-83. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/765/1436.

Alavi, S. M., & Taghizadeh, M. (2013).Cognitive presence in a virtual learning community: An EFL Case. International Journal of E-learning & Distance Education, 27(1). Retrieved from http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/818.

Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conference environment. Journal of Asynchronous learning Networks, 5(2), 1-17.

Arbaugh, J. B. (2008). Does the community of inquiry framework predict outcomes in online MBA courses? The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 9(2). Retrieved from http://goo.gl/tDN3lc.

Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13 (1-2), 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006.

Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133-136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003.

Arnold, N., & Ducate, L. (2006). Future foreign language teachers’ social and cognitive collaboration in an online environment. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 42-66. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num1/arnoldducate/default.html.

Asoodar, M., Atai, M. R., Vaezi, S., & Marandi, S. S. (2014). Examining effectiveness of communities of practice in online English for academic purposes (EAP) assessment in virtual classes. Computers & Education., 70, 291-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.016.

Atai, M. R. (2006). EAP teacher education: Searching for an effective model integrating content and language teachers’ schemes. Retreived from: http://www.paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/PAAL11/pdfs/03.pdf.

Burguess, M. L., Slate, J. R., Rojas-LeBouef, A., & LaPrairie, K. (2010). Teaching and learning in Second Life: Using the community of inquiry (CoI) model to support online instruction with graduate students in instructional technology. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 84-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.12.003.

Chen, S. T. (2012). Perceptions of online TESOL teacher education: Strengths, weaknesses, characteristics, and effective components (Doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California, USA.

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Gairín Sallán, J. (2006).Las comunidades virtuales de aprendizaje [Virtual communities of learning]. Educar, 37, 41-64.

Garrison, D. R. (2013). Theoretical foundations and epistemological insights of the community of inquiry. In Z. Akyol & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 1-11). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch001.

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516 (00)00016-6.

Garrison, D. R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T. S. (2010). Exploring causal relationships among teaching, cognitive and social presence: Student perceptions of the community of inquiry framework.The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 31-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002.

Goda, Y., & Yamada, M. (2013). Application of CoI to design CSCL for EFL online asynchronous discussion. In Z. Akyol & D.R. Garrison (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (295-316). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch014.

Harrasim, L. (2006, March). Online collaborative learning (OCL): The next generation for elearning. Public presentation made in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Ke, F. (2010). Examining online teaching, cognitive, and social presence for adult students. Computers & Education, 55(2), 808-820. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.013.

Kennedy, D., & Kennedy, N. S. (2013). Community of philosophical inquiry online and off: Retrospectus and prospectus. In Z. Akyol & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry: Theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 12-29). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch002.

Kumar, S., Dawson, K., Black, E., Cavanaugh, C., & Sessums, C. (2011). Applying the community of inquiry framework to an online professional practice doctoral program. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 12(6), 126-142.

Lambert, J. L., & Fisher, J. L. (2013). Community of inquiry framework: Establishing community in an online course. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(1), 1-16.

Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2007). Social presence in virtual communities of foreign language (FL) teachers. System, 35(2), 208-228. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2006.11.002.

Olesova, L., Richardson, J., Weasenforth, D., & Meloni, C. (2011). Using asynchronous instructional audio feedback in online environments: A mixed methods study. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1). Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no1/olesova_0311.htm.

Randrianasolo, S. (2013). Moving online: Using the community of inquiry framework to redesign English composition for international students (doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, USA.

Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2010). Learning presence: Towards a theory of self-efficacy, self-regulation, and the development of a communities of inquiry in online and blended learning environments. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1721-1731. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.017.

Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Glazer, H. R., Engle, C. L., Harris, R. A., Johnston, S. M., . . . Trinko, L. A. (2007). Creating shared understanding through chats in a community of inquiry.The Internet and Higher Education, 10(2), 103-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.02.002.

Stodel, E. J., Thompson, T. L., & MacDonald, C. J. (2006). Learners’ perspectives on what is missing from online learning: Interpretations through the community of inquiry framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 7(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/325/743.

Tolu, A. T. (2010). An exploration of synchronous communication in an online pre-service ESOL course: Community of inquiry perspective (doctoral dissertation). University of South Florida, USA.

Tolu, A. T., & Evans, L. S. (2013). From distance education to communities of inquiry: A review of historical developments. In Z. Akyol & D. R. Garrison (Eds.), Educational communities of inquiry theoretical framework, research and practice (pp. 45-65). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch004.

Vaughan, N., & Garrison, D. R. (2005). Creating cognitive presence in a blended faculty development community. Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.11.001.

Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51-55). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Yamada, M., Goda, Y., Matsukawa, H., Hata, K., & Yasunami, S. (2014). What psychological factors enhance a language learning community? Toward effective CSCL design for language learning based on a CoI framework. In E. Popescu, R. W. H. Lau, K. Leung, & M. Laanpere (Eds.), Advances in web-based learning – ICWL 2014 (pp. 43-55). Switzerland: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09635-3_5.