EFL Students’ Perceptions of Social Issues in Famous Works of Art

Main Article Content

Lizmendy Zuhey Bautista Urrego
Ingrid Judith Parra Toro

Abstract

This article reports on a qualitative, descriptive, and interpretative research intervention case study of English as a foreign language students’ construction of perceptions on social issues found in famous works of art. Participants in this study engaged in the practice of critical thinking as a strategy to appreciate art that expresses social issues. The research was conducted at a Colombian public school over ten days. Famous works of art were presented with the purpose of creating a conversation club in which students were expected to identify and discuss social issues implicit in those works of art. Data were collected through direct observation, field notes, and interviews. Findings showed participants’ perceptions of works of art while interacting in English conversations.

 

Article Details

How to Cite
Bautista Urrego, L. Z., & Parra Toro, I. J. (2016). EFL Students’ Perceptions of Social Issues in Famous Works of Art. HOW, 23(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.19183/how.23.1.117
Section
Reports on Pedagogical Experiences
Author Biographies

Lizmendy Zuhey Bautista Urrego, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Lizmendy Zuhey Bautista Urrego holds a BA in Modern Languages from Universidad Distrital, Colombia. She has taught in private schools in Bogota. She was a speaker at the III Encuentro Bi-universitario de Futuros Maestros de Lenguas Extranjeras sobre Investigación Formativa e Innovación Pedagógica, Universidad Industrial de Santander (Colombia). She studied English proficiency at Boston Academy of English, MA.

Ingrid Judith Parra Toro, Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas

Ingrid Judith Parra Toro holds a BA in Modern Languages from Universidad Distrital, Colombia. She has taught in private schools in Bogota. She was a speaker at the III Encuentro Bi-universitario de Futuros Maestros de Lenguas Extranjeras sobre Investigación Formativa e Innovación Pedagógica, Universidad Industrial de Santander (Colombia). She completed a course in ESL from I.E.L.I. Hunter College, NY.

References

Alvarado, L., & García, M. (2008). Características más relevantes del paradigma socio-crítico: su aplicación en investigaciones de educación ambiental y de enseñanza de las ciencias realizadas en el doctorado de educación del instituto pedagógico de Caracas. [Most relevant characteristics of the socio-critical paradigm: Its application in environmental education and science teaching research]. Sapiens: Revista Universitaria de Investigación, 9(2), 187-202.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Longman.

Avivi, Y. (2006). Room for variation? The experience of Colombian gay asylum seekers and asylees in Miami. Sociedad y Economía, 11. Retrieved from http://sociedadyeconomia.univalle.edu.co/index.php/sye/article/view/158.

Bloom, B. S. (1971). Taxonomía de los objetivos de la educación: la clasificación de las metas educacionales [Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals.] Buenos Aires, AR: El Ateneo.

Cole, R. T. (2011, November 15). Letters: Child abuse victims lose more than innocence [comment]. USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/opinion/letters/story/2011-11-15/Penn-State-scandal-child-sex-abuse/51225638/1.

Dewey, J. (1934/2008). El arte como experiencia (J. Claramonte, Trans.) [Art as experience]. Barcelona, ES: Paidós.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Millbrae, CA: The California Academic Press.

Gamboa, R. (2011). El papel de la teoría crítica en la investigación educativa y cualitativa [The role of critical theory in educational qualitative research]. Revista Electrónica Diálogos Educativos, 11(21), 48-64.

Giroux, H. A. (1987). Critical literacy and student experience: Donald Graves’ approach to literacy. Language Arts, 64(2), 175-181.

Hammersley, M. (2005). Close encounters of a political kind: The threat from the evidence-based policy-making and practice movement. Qualitative Researcher, 1, 2-4.

Jensen, J. (2001). Art, the public and Deweyan cultural criticism. In D. K. Perry (Ed.), American pragmatism and communication research (pp. 109-126). Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis e-Library.

Lather, P. (2006). Foucauldian scientificity: Rethinking the nexus of qualitative research and educational policy analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(6), 783-791. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09518390600976006.

Layton, R. (2003). Art and agency: A reassessment. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(3), 447-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.00158.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Pineda, C. (2004). Critical thinking in the EFL classroom: The search for a pedagogical alternative to improve English learning. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 9(15), 45-80.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. London, UK: Sage.

Timulak, L. (2003). Empowerment events in process-experiential psychotherapy of depression: An exploratory qualitative analysis. Psychotherapy Research, 13(4), 443-460.