Exploring critical perspectives in English teaching and learning at a Colombian university
Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract
A critical perspectives approach to teaching and learning English as a foreign language is a relatively recent practice in the global South, and even though there are reports that explain how this approach is enacted in the curriculum, few studies have been conducted on how teacher educators and pre-service teachers deal with its implementation in their everyday practices. Hence, a descriptive qualitative study was conducted at a public university to delve into the perceptions of teachers and pre-service teachers regarding this approach and the challenges that it entails. The participants were nine in-service teachers and 31 pre-service teachers teaching and learning English following a curriculum based on critical and intercultural perspectives. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, document analysis, and a survey. The thematic analysis of the data yielded results that suggest a nuanced perception of participants, especially the pre-service teachers, and highlight the challenges that both groups of participants undertake when teaching and learning English through critical perspectives. These findings suggest an important issue to the EFL field, which is the need for going beyond language as a system when teaching and learning it, while ensuring in-service teachers’ professional development and the adequate balance between linguistic aspects of the language and the promotion of critical awareness.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors of the manuscripts accepted for publication in HOW journal are required to sign a nonexclusive license agreement allowing ASOCOPI to reproduce the full text on the Internet or in any other available source. Authors retain copyright of their manuscripts with the following restrictions: first publication is granted to ASOCOPI; nonexclusive agreements with third parties can be established as long as the original publication in the HOW journal is properly acknowledged.
References
Banegas, D. L., & Villacañas de Castro, L. S. (2016). Criticality. Elt Journal, 70(4), 455-457.
Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Castellotti, V. (2017). Pour une didactique de l’appropriation : diversité, compréhension, relation. Didier.
Creswell, J. (2003). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage Publications.
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: MA: Pearson.
Crookes, G. (2012). Critical pedagogy in language teaching. In L. Ortega (Ed.) The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (1-9) Wiley-Blackwell.
Darvin, R. & Norton, B. (2015). Identity, Language Learning, and Critical Pedagogies in Digital Times. In Cenoz, J., Gorter, D., May, S. (Eds.) Language Awareness and Multilingualism. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. (1-12) Springer Cham.
Echeverri-Sucerquia, P. A. (2020). Critical Pedagogy and L2 Education in the Hemispheric South. L2 Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.5070/L212246621
Escuela de Idiomas (2022). Proyecto Educativo del Programa –PEP–
Fernandez-Balboa, J.-M. (2014). Critical Pedagogy: Making Critical Thinking Really Critical. Analytic Teaching, 13(2). https://journal.viterbo.edu/index.php/at/article/view/585
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of freedom: ethics, democracy, and civic courage. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.
García, O. (2019). Decolonizing foreign, second, heritage, and first languages: Implications for education. In D. Macedo (Ed.) Decolonizing foreign language education: The Misteaching of English and Other Colonial Languages (152-168) Routledge.
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Glesne, C. (2006). Becoming qualitative researchers. Boston: Pearson.
Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). Understanding language teaching: from method to postmethod. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
Liddicoat, A. J., & Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural language teaching and learning. Wiley-Blackwell.
Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey -Bass Publishers.
Nieto, S. (2009). Language, Culture, and Teaching Critical Perspectives. Routledge.
Reagan, T. G., & Osborn, T. A. (2002). The foreign language educator in society: toward a critical pedagogy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associate.
Shohamy, E. (2007). Language tests as language policy tools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 14(1), 117-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701272948
Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Comisión Institucional de Ética & Comité Central de Ética en la Investigación (n.d.). Código de ética en investigación de la Universidad de Antioquia. https://www.udea.edu.co/wps/wcm/connect/udea/e79da6b4-1402-496b-88bc-0dc0321ba827/codigo-etica-udea.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CVID=luvyYgZ